Cruising
USA, 1980
Director: William Friedkin
Stars: Al Pacino, Paul Sorvino, Karen Allen
Our Rating:
(see more films with this rating)

Ten years after he made the equally - and just as unfairly - ostracised The Boys In The Band, William Friedkin, director of The Exorcist, made Cruising. But like Basic Instinct and The Silence of the Lambs, Cruising is a movie that was turned into a gay rights object by misguided, panic-button gay activists, not by its content.

I saw Cruising for the first time in 2003, and I couldn’t work out what the fuss was about. This is a pretty plain film, ruined by strange climax choices, murky lighting (blame the gays, see below) and bad editing, that's good for a squiz at seventies leather bars and Al Pacino disco dancing on poppers, but not a great deal else. If the characters and the killers hadn’t been gay, Cruising wouldn’t have won much notoriety at all, for it’s a pretty average thriller, lacking the class of Friedkin's aforementioned pair of blue-ribbon classics. At best, if it hadn’t been set upon when it was released, it might have become a quiet cult film due to its oddness, and its interrogation scene involving a seven foot tall black bodybuilder in a g-string.

Gay activist critics of Cruising claimed that its hard-edged portrayal of the gay leather scene confirmed that film makers were ignorant and hateful of gays, and, worse, that the movie's content would inflame public gay hate and misunderstanding. However nothing in Cruising struck me as being unusual, biased or unfairly critical. Some guys do get leathered up on a Saturday night, take heaps of drugs and get fisted in slings while others watch. Isn't part of the thrill of hardcore sex the fact that you’re going right to the edge of your physical and mental limits, a volatile place where injury lurks? Speaking for myself, I’d shit myself if I found myself in a bar like this, and I’m gay. What’s so strange about depicting the gay/leather club scene as a hard-edged, threatening place, when, for many people, me included, that’s exactly what it is? The tone of Cruising isn’t evidence of rivers of dark hatred and ignorance, it's actually closer to documentary.


Gay extras wait for "Action!" on the set of
Cruising.

And as for self-loathing, whether they admit it or not, or even know it, a lot of gay guys have father issues – they do, just as a lot of straight people do. People have mother issues as well, this kind of thing isn’t rare or psychopathic, it’s normal. The killer in Cruising hates being gay because he feels guilty for potentially embarrassing and disappointing his father. Okay -what’s wrong with that? What’s so threatening about that idea? (I’m talking about the guilt, not the killing, by the way.) There's nothing shocking and unexpected about it – I would have thought a great many gay guys felt the same, at some point in their lives, if not all the time, always. Cruising uses this basic psychological template as a basis for it’s killer’s twisted psyche. That’s simplistic, lazy screenwriting, but it isn’t "homophobia".

Unfortunately, and again, like Basic Instinct and Silence of the Lambs, the fuss made over the film only fulfills its own prophecy, and brings the negativity to life. In Cruising, there is no direct connection between the killer and his homosexuality, not directly. Nothing in the film suggests that any of the hundreds of patrons inside the leather bars could potentially grab a knife and start carving each other up, in fact, several scenes show a community that is highly organised and full of aware, intelligent and stable adults. Bear in mind that that the bar scenes were filmed on location with real leather queens playing themselves, and one scene involves a suspicious looking Pacino booted out by diligent bouncers who sense he’s not one of the crowd.

How symbolic that gay activists disrupted the filming of Cruising by blowing whistles to spoil the sound checks and shining mirrors onto the set to ruin the lighting. God forbid a movie about gays shouldn't be in the model of It's A Wonderful Life.


Related Reading
Hard
Dahmer

Review by Mark Adnum

Your Comments
1. You make many good points, but I'm going to guess that you weren't around when the film first came out. I, too, saw the film for the first time sometime in the last 10 years and it DOES seem tame now and you wonder what the fuss was about. But gay bashings DID rise after this film came out. My partner was a counselor at the university at Buffalo at the time and got a lot of panicky phone calls from closeted young gay guys who wondered if Cruising is what their lives were going to turn out to be.
By the way, let me just say that I love your site and your reviews. But I just want to give you a little extra historical perspective. I'm 49, I don't know how old you are, but back then, as you know, there were no films like Brokeback Mountain and no shows on TV like "Will and Grace." For many young gay men, Cruising was their first exposure to gay life and they had nothing else to compare it to. That was part of its problem. And let's face it, these activists were right when they said that straight people watching the film would take it to be representative of ALL gay people. A gay author (I can't remember his name at the moment) says in the film of "The Celluloid Closet" that he was beaten up back in 1980 by a bunch of college kids who had just seen Cruising.
Again, the film doesn't seem THAT bad when viewed today; I don't loathe it like others of my generation do but i DO dislike the implication at the end that Al Pacino killed the nice gay guy down the hall because of his exposure to the "lifestyle." THAT was unnecessary.
But, like I said, you raise many good points and you are right that some gay audiences just want their films to feature cute cuddly harmless "positive" role models and nothing else.

by: Michael D. Klemm, Thursday June 7

2. It is a bad film purely because of poor direction, a week storyline and some atrocious acting.If it hadn't had all the publicity it would have been a strong candidate for the straight-to-video bargain bin (basement floor level). It doesn't even qualify as "so bad it's good". It's so bad it's crap.
by: Tom Bannister, Saturday July 14


All fields required; all comments will be published.

Film:
 
Your Comments:
 
Your Name:
   

Watch it today at FalconXXX.com!

Outrate.net: Homosexuality and Movies ... Re-Viewed
home/film reviews/interviews/features/info
contact: mark @ outrate.net